Kiefer Sherwood had three shots when San Jose beat Ottawa 6–2 earlier this month. Shane Pinto took four for the Senators and finished without an assist. Both players were involved, but in different ways that could interest someone backing another Sharks win.
These Sharks parlay picks start with a hypothetical San Jose win and compare Sherwood to reach two shots, Pinto to finish without an assist and Thomas Chabot to go without a point. The prices reward different demands: a modest shooting target, room for an Ottawa forward to score himself, or a completely quiet scoring line from a Senators defenseman.
Sharks parlay picks: three ways to support the home side
The records cover completed current-club games from October 1, 2025 through October 30, 2026, using the same dates and participation rules for both columns. They compare Sharks wins or Senators losses with all the player’s games for that club. These are historical hit rates, not today’s probabilities. Individual DraftKings odds can change.
| Player & prop | Odds | With this result | All current-team games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiefer Sherwood 2+ shots on goal |
−130 | 84.2% 16 of 19 Sharks wins |
57.1% 24 of 42 appearances |
| Shane Pinto Under 0.5 assists |
−310 | 90.7% 39 of 43 Senators losses |
72.2% 65 of 90 appearances |
| Thomas Chabot Under 0.5 points |
−195 | 81.8% 27 of 33 Senators losses |
60.6% 43 of 71 appearances |
Kiefer Sherwood: 2+ shots on goal at −130
Sherwood has reached two shots in each of his last five appearances, with three against Vancouver in the latest Sharks win. That game brought 18:01 of ice time and 2:45 on the power play. His recent shooting gives San Jose backers something to consider alongside the team result.
The longer record is encouraging, but his current season has been less consistent: he’s cleared in five of seven Sharks wins and seven of 14 appearances overall. Two of his three winning-game misses in the full window came this season. The more recent one was a one-shot finish against St. Louis despite 17:57 of ice time and 4:24 on the power play.
That’s the tradeoff against his one-shot alternative at −550. He’s recorded at least one shot in all 19 San Jose wins in this window; asking for a second cuts that to 16 and gives a much larger individual payout at −130. The two-shot line leaves less margin for a quiet shooting night.
His earlier Ottawa meeting brought three shots and two assists in 18:39. That was productive involvement, but he’s averaging about 15½ minutes this season, down from nearly 17 in the older San Jose games. The latest run supports the two-shot idea; the lower season workload and those one-shot wins are reasons to keep the target modest.
Shane Pinto: under 0.5 assists at −310
Pinto scored in each of Ottawa’s last two losses, against Vegas and Los Angeles, without recording an assist in either game. Those finishes show what this restriction allows. He can put a puck in the net and still clear an assist under.
That room costs more than the no-point alternative. DraftKings had Pinto under 0.5 points at −145, compared with −310 for no assists. The point under would have lost in both recent goal-only games. If you expect him to remain a shooting threat while Ottawa loses, the assist line better matches that view.
His no-assist record in Senators losses is stronger than his all-game record, and he’s cleared in five of six defeats this season. The earlier San Jose loss was another example: four shots, no points and 20:17 on the ice. He was involved enough to threaten without setting up a goal.
His workload still gives him chances to make that pass. He’s averaging about 20 minutes, a little more than in the older Ottawa games. In the Vegas defeat he played 23:06, including 3:13 on the power play. His current losing-game miss came against St. Louis, with an assist in 18:20 and 3:37 of power-play time. The under asks for no assists through substantial playing time.
Thomas Chabot: under 0.5 points at −195
Chabot’s line asks for no goals or assists. He’s finished without a point in all four Ottawa losses he’s appeared in this season, including the latest 6–5 defeat at Los Angeles. Ottawa scoring five was compatible with Chabot staying off the scoresheet; he finished with two shots in 22:37.
He’s listed on the expected second defense pair and has averaged about 25 minutes this season, up from just over 23 in the older games. Some of the scoreless defeats have included plenty of opportunity. Against Detroit he took five shots in 26:12, with 3:43 on the power play. There was no point that night, but that level of involvement gives him ways to beat an under.
The assist-only alternative was −275. It cleared in 28 of 33 Ottawa losses in this window, compared with 27 for the point under at −195. The extra historical success was a goal-only game against Edmonton. Allowing that kind of goal produces a heavier price; accepting that either a goal or an assist loses gives you the larger payout.
His longer losing-game record is less consistent than the current four of four. A March defeat to Washington brought an assist in 28:06, including 3:56 on the power play. Four scoreless losses this season don’t remove that opportunity. Choose this line if you want the lighter price and are comfortable requiring no goals or assists.
Choose the supporting line that fits
Sherwood offers the lightest price here and a way to ask for San Jose involvement through shots. Pinto’s line gives an Ottawa shooter room to score himself. Chabot’s demands the quietest scoring outcome, with a smaller price than his more forgiving assist under.
The two Ottawa unders share the same game environment, and Sherwood’s shots belong to that game too. Treat their records as separate descriptions of past results, rather than independent probabilities to multiply. Compare today’s offers on the Sharks–Senators matchup page, or explore more angles in our NHL coverage.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.