Desmond Bane scored 13 points when Orlando beat Charlotte in April. Seven rebounds still brought him to 20 combined, which is why his points-and-rebounds floor makes this Magic card ahead of a points-only target. For Sunday’s visit from Boston, that gives us one way to support an Orlando win without needing Bane to repeat the six threes he made in his latest outing.
The premise here is a hypothetical Magic moneyline win, quoted at +210 by DraftKings at 7:36 a.m. EST. Boston arrives 4–1 and Orlando 2–3 for the November 1 matchup at Kia Center, scheduled for 3:30 p.m. EST. Alongside Bane, we’re looking at Franz Wagner’s scoring floor and a Jayson Tatum points under. These are individual options to compare around that Orlando-win idea; the prices below are individual quotes, and the historical rates do not give us a combined parlay probability.
| Player & prop | Odds | With this result | All games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Desmond Bane 20+ points and rebounds Last season + this season |
−231 | 86.3% 44 of 51 ORL wins |
74.0% 71 of 96 appearances |
| Franz Wagner 18+ points Last season + this season |
−313 | 84.6% 22 of 26 ORL wins |
71.1% 32 of 45 appearances |
| Jayson Tatum Under 26.5 points Last season + this season |
−107 | 100.0% 7 of 7 BOS losses |
85.2% 23 of 27 appearances |
The table covers October 1, 2025 through October 31, 2026 for each player’s current team, including postseason games. “With this result” means Magic wins for Bane and Wagner, and Celtics losses for Tatum. The all-game column uses the same appearances without that result filter. Games with playing time remain in the record even when the player had a quiet night or played fewer minutes.
Desmond Bane 20+ points and rebounds (−231)
Bane’s latest win was powered by shooting: 28 points, including six threes on 12 attempts, plus two rebounds in Orlando’s 121–114 victory at Toronto. The previous win, 111–102 against New York, brought 22 points and six boards. Those totals of 30 and 28 both clear this target, but a 20 combined line leaves room for a less spectacular scoring night.
Across last season and this one, Bane reached 20 combined in 44 of 51 Magic wins (86.3%), compared with 71 of 96 appearances overall (74.0%). This season’s split is two of two wins and three of five appearances. That’s a useful distinction from simply chasing his most recent box score: the longer record gives us considerably more than two wins to examine.
The points-only alternative shows what the rebounds can add. Bane’s 15+ points at −283 cleared in 43 of those 51 wins and 73 of 96 appearances overall. The combined option carries a lighter price and retains one more winning game on balance, although it clears slightly fewer games overall. In the April 17 win over Charlotte, his 13 points and seven rebounds reached exactly 20. Fifteen points would have missed even though he played 35 minutes.
There is also a cheaper, more demanding combined target: 24+ points and rebounds at −105. That cleared in 34 of 51 wins and 50 of 96 appearances. The ten additional winning clears at 20 are the reason to pay for the lower target. The lower target leaves room for more of Bane’s recorded winning performances, while still depending on his scoring and rebounding in this game.
His April 10 Chicago game makes that limit clear. Orlando won 127–103, while Bane finished with two points and one rebound in 17 minutes. That game stays among the seven winning misses. More recently, he had just five points and two boards in the Minnesota loss, then 13 points and five boards in the first Toronto meeting. Bane is an expected starter, but neither an Orlando win nor his current role guarantees enough shots, rebounds or minutes to reach 20.
Franz Wagner 18+ points (−313)
Wagner scored 23 against New York and 26 in Friday’s Toronto win. The latter also included 11 assists in 39 minutes, so scoring was only part of his contribution. With Paolo Banchero out with an ankle injury and Jalen Suggs out with a knee injury, Wagner’s playmaking matters to this lineup. Those absences don’t promise that extra responsibility will turn into extra points.
The 18-point target cleared in 22 of 26 Orlando wins (84.6%) and 32 of 45 appearances overall (71.1%) across the two seasons. In this season’s five games, it cleared both wins and four games overall. The recent miss was 15 points in the 129–99 Toronto loss on October 28; he returned with 26 two nights later.
There is a substantial price difference between this floor and 20+ points at −202. But the historical gap is substantial too: 20 cleared in 15 of the same 26 wins and 23 of 45 appearances overall. Eighteen retains seven additional winning games. For example, Wagner scored 19 in Orlando’s 94–88 playoff win over Detroit on April 27. A low-scoring Magic win could accommodate 18 without supplying 20.
Even this floor has missed in a win. In the April 25 playoff meeting with Detroit, Wagner scored 17 in 34 minutes as Orlando won 113–105. One more point would have changed the result of the prop. Dropping to 15+ points at −670 would retain that game and raises the winning count to 24 of 26, with 37 of 45 clears overall. That’s more room at a much heavier price; 18 is the compromise here, with four historical winning misses left in view.
Bane and Wagner also share the same Orlando possessions. Both scoring contributions fit this proposed win, but adding both options doesn’t make their hit rates independent. Compare their individual prices and demands before deciding how much of the same team’s offense you want to rely on.
Jayson Tatum under 26.5 points (−107)
Tatum stayed below 27 points in all seven Boston losses in his two-season appearance record. He scored 24, 16, 24, 19, 24, 17 and 13 in those games. The under also cleared in 23 of his 27 appearances overall (85.2%), so it has been common across results rather than something that happens only when Boston loses.
Seven losses is a small conditional sample, and six came last season. The only Boston loss in his current five-game record was the opener at Detroit, when he scored 13 points on 6-for-23 shooting in 38 minutes. His 11 assists in that game are a reminder that a scoring under needn’t mean a quiet night in every category.
The current scoring counterweight is strong. Tatum put up 36 against New York and 40 against Brooklyn, both Boston wins; both would beat this under. His latest game was much closer to the boundary: 26 points on 20 field-goal attempts in the 125–111 win over Chicago. One additional point would have turned that clear into a miss. The under is three of five this season, not a continuation of a perfect all-game run.
That’s why the seven-for-seven losing record belongs beside his recent shot volume. If your Orlando-win case still leaves room for Tatum to score heavily while Boston falls short elsewhere, this under adds a restriction your game view may not need. The matchup result alone cannot put a ceiling on his scoring. If combining any options with Orlando to win, use the sportsbook’s actual same-game parlay quote; these separate prices and historical records do not establish the combined price or probability.
Follow the live Celtics–Magic matchup for the latest game context, and find more matchup analysis in our NBA coverage. Each option above has a different job: Bane can get help from rebounds, Wagner has a lower scoring target at a heavier price, and Tatum’s under asks the Boston scorer to stay below 27.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.