Beckett Sennecke scored twice when Anaheim lost 5–2 to Edmonton on October 7, 2026, but he finished without an assist. That is the distinction behind these Senators parlay picks: if you’re backing Ottawa, you can leave room for a Ducks forward to score without asking him to set up a teammate’s goal.
The premise is a hypothetical Senators moneyline win, quoted at −118 by DraftKings at 10:56 a.m. EST on November 1. Ottawa visits Anaheim at Honda Center on Sunday, November 1, at 8 p.m. EST. Sennecke and Alex Killorn both offer an under-0.5-assists option, at very different prices. Side & Support compares how those choices have held in Anaheim losses and across each player’s Ducks appearances, leaving you to decide which cost and workload fit your view of the game.
Senators parlay picks: two assist unders to compare
These records cover Anaheim appearances since the start of the 2025–26 season, including the playoffs and this season through Saturday. Each losing-game record is compared with that player’s full Ducks sample over the same period. Shortened appearances and genuine zeroes remain in the records; games without an appearance aren’t counted. Individual DraftKings odds are a November 1 morning snapshot and can change.
| Player & prop | Odds | With this result | All games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beckett Sennecke Under 0.5 assists |
−155 | 83.0% 44 of 53 Ducks losses |
67.3% 72 of 107 appearances |
| Alex Killorn Under 0.5 assists |
−370 | 90.6% 48 of 53 Ducks losses |
80.4% 86 of 107 appearances |
Beckett Sennecke: under 0.5 assists at −155
Sennecke gives you the lighter price of the two. His goal against Vancouver came without an assist, as did his goal against Boston and that two-goal night against Edmonton. All three were Anaheim losses. An active Sennecke isn’t necessarily a problem for this prop; the part you need to avoid is the helper.
That is a different bet from asking him to finish without a point. DraftKings has under 0.5 points at +145, but he was scoreless in only 30 of his 53 Ducks losses across the period. The assist under held in 44. Paying −155 leaves his own goals available, which explains why the two prices shouldn’t be treated as interchangeable ways to oppose him.
His current losing-game record is seven clears in eight appearances, compared with 10 of 13 games overall. The latest defeat supplied the exception: Sennecke had a goal and an assist when Buffalo beat Anaheim 7–6, playing 21:13 with 4:10 on the power play. A Senators win with plenty of Ducks scoring could still leave room for the assist that beats this under.
His workload also deserves more weight than the older record alone. He’s averaging about 20½ minutes this season, up from roughly 17½ in the preceding-season sample. That gives him more opportunity to create a goal, even though most of his recent losses have ended without a helper. The appeal at −155 is the combination of the losing-game pattern and the lighter cost, with that extra ice time part of the decision.
Alex Killorn: under 0.5 assists at −370
Killorn has the stronger full-period record, but it comes at a much higher price. He went without an assist in 90.6% of his Anaheim losses, against 80.4% of all his Ducks appearances. His current record in defeats is the same seven of eight as Sennecke’s, so the difference between their prices isn’t backed by a better losing-game fraction this season.
Their recent workloads do differ. Killorn has averaged just under 16 minutes this season, about a minute less than in the preceding-season sample. In the Buffalo loss, he played 13 minutes and had no points, including 46 seconds on the power play. That’s a smaller recent workload than Sennecke’s, without needing to assume Killorn will get the same minutes tonight.
He’s not out of the scoring picture. His assist in the 5–2 loss to the Rangers on October 19, 2026, came in 18:44, including 2:01 on the power play. And he assisted against Philadelphia in an Anaheim win. The losing-game record is useful, but Ottawa winning doesn’t prevent him from helping create a Ducks goal.
Killorn’s point under offers a cheaper alternative at −195. It held in 41 of his 53 Anaheim losses, compared with 48 for the assist under. His goal without an assist in the 3–2 loss to the Islanders on October 20, 2026, shows the difference: it would beat the point under while leaving the assist under intact. The −370 price buys that room, with less profit for each dollar risked. It is a reason to compare the options carefully, rather than automatically choose the higher historical percentage.
Decide how much room to give Anaheim
Sennecke is the lower-cost choice, with more recent ice time and an assist in his latest loss to weigh against it. Killorn offers the longer record of staying off the assist sheet and a smaller recent workload, at a steeper price. Neither requires a Ducks shutout.
You can choose one rather than stack both. Two Anaheim assist unders put more of your ticket behind who creates the Ducks’ goals; the separate records don’t establish their combined chance of success, and a sportsbook can adjust related selections’ pricing. Compare the actual combined quote before adding either prop. Check the live Senators–Ducks matchup for the game markets, or explore more NHL parlay ideas.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.