Derrick White had seven assists when Boston beat Milwaukee earlier this week. Paul George scored 25 that night but finished with only three rebounds. If you’re backing another Celtics win, that contrast is a useful place to start: Boston getting the result doesn’t mean every supporting contribution follows.
These Celtics parlay picks compare White’s assists and George’s rebounds in Boston wins with Jaime Jaquez Jr.’s combined production in Milwaukee losses. Side & Support Parlay Plays gives you three ways to support a Boston-win view, with each player’s record across all his appearances alongside it so you can choose the contribution you want.
Three Celtics parlay picks to compare
White’s row covers his Boston appearances in the 2025–26 and 2026–27 regular seasons. George and Jaquez have much shorter current-club records: eight Boston appearances and nine with Milwaukee this season. Individual DraftKings prices were observed Sunday morning, November 8, and can change.
| Player & prop | Odds | With this result | All appearances |
|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick White 4+ assists 2025–26 & 2026–27 regular seasons |
−232 | 91.5% 54 of 59 BOS wins |
81.4% 70 of 86 BOS appearances |
| Paul George 5+ rebounds 2026–27 regular season |
−138 | 85.7% 6 of 7 BOS wins |
87.5% 7 of 8 BOS appearances |
| Jaime Jaquez Jr. 20+ points + rebounds + assists 2026–27 regular season |
−180 | 100.0% 8 of 8 MIL losses |
88.9% 8 of 9 MIL appearances |
Derrick White: 4+ assists
White followed those seven assists against Milwaukee with five in 25 minutes against Charlotte. Four assists gives you a passing contribution from Boston’s expected starting point guard without asking him to be its leading scorer. The longer record supports the idea, and he’s reached it in six of the Celtics’ seven wins this season.
The choice on the ladder matters. Four assists cost −232; five was −103. That lighter price asks for a step White managed in only 43 of 59 Boston wins and 53 of 86 appearances across the two regular seasons, compared with 54 wins and seventy appearances at four. This season’s two Chicago wins both ended with exactly four assists, once in eighteen minutes and once in 26.
Three assists was a much heavier −620. Dropping that low added only three Boston wins to the longer record, bringing the totals to 57 of 59 wins and eighty of 86 appearances. Four is the compromise here: some room below his latest five and seven, without paying the price for three.
His recent miss is worth taking seriously. Boston beat Orlando with White producing only two assists in 34 minutes; he then had three in thirty minutes in the loss to Houston. A full shift hasn’t always produced four, and Boston can win while its other playmakers do more of the creating.
Last spring’s playoffs add another caution. White reached four assists in only one of Boston’s three wins over Philadelphia, finishing with six, two and three in those victories. Those games are separate from the table’s regular-season record. The regular-season passing pattern is useful, but it hasn’t carried unchanged into every setting.
Paul George: 5+ rebounds
George’s latest five rebounds came in just 22 minutes against Charlotte. Earlier Boston wins brought seven against New York and Brooklyn, five against Chicago, then six against Chicago and Orlando. Five boards has remained attainable without needing a large scoring night, including the latest game when he scored eight.
At −138, five rebounds was considerably lighter than four at −298. Both choices covered the same six Boston wins and the same seven appearances overall in his short Celtics record. The one game that missed five also missed four, so the lower offer didn’t buy another successful game in this sample.
Six rebounds paid +143, but that would have covered only four of his seven Boston wins and four of eight appearances overall. The higher payout asks you to give up the two winning nights that finished exactly on five, including Charlotte. If you’re choosing the rebound route, five has a clearer case than stretching to six.
The uncomfortable detail is that his only miss came against this opponent. George had three rebounds in 35 minutes when Boston beat Milwaukee 109–102, despite scoring 25 with five threes and five assists. He was productive, and the Celtics won, but the boards didn’t come with it.
This is an early Boston pattern, based on eight recorded appearances, all starts. His five-rebound rate is actually a little higher across all eight games than in the seven wins, so the case is that the target has often remained reachable when Boston wins. It isn’t evidence that a Celtics victory makes him more likely to rebound, and that recent Milwaukee game keeps the choice grounded.
Jaime Jaquez Jr.: 20+ points, rebounds and assists
Backing Boston doesn’t require every Bucks player to struggle. Jaquez had eighteen points, two rebounds and two assists in the recent loss to the Celtics. His combined 22 cleared twenty even though Milwaukee lost, which is the contribution this option asks him to repeat.
The broader contribution helped against Cleveland, too. Jaquez scored only eight, but seven rebounds and five assists brought him to exactly twenty. A fourteen-point scoring offer at −118 missed that game, covering seven of eight Milwaukee losses and seven of nine appearances overall. The twenty combined offer at −180 survived it. You’re paying more to let his rebounds and passing count toward the total.
His latest Toronto game also finished exactly on twenty: fourteen points, three rebounds and three assists in 28 minutes. That makes the nearby 22-point combined offer at −119 a meaningful change. It would have missed both Toronto and Cleveland, covering six of Milwaukee’s eight losses and six of nine appearances overall.
Fifteen combined cost −640 and covered the same games as twenty. The only overall miss was Milwaukee’s win over Indiana, when Jaquez had eight points, six rebounds and no assists in 25 minutes. Paying for fifteen didn’t rescue that fourteen-point total, and the extra cost brought no additional coverage in these nine appearances.
Jaquez has started all nine recorded Milwaukee games, playing between 23 and 35 minutes. That gives the comparison a consistent starting role, but eight losses still make a small perfect record. Two of those totals landed exactly on twenty, so there hasn’t always been spare production to absorb a quieter night.
Sharpest Bets Premium
Get our Celtics vs. Bucks picks.
Unlock our model's best bets for this matchup, plus projections, trends, and matchup analysis. Start with a free 7-day trial, then save 20% every month with code PARLAY20.
Pick the contribution that fits your Celtics view
White’s assists offer the longer Boston record. George’s rebounds cost less, with a direct warning from the last Milwaukee meeting. Jaquez gives you a different route if you expect Boston to win while he still contributes across the box score. You can choose among them; taking every option adds more things that must happen, and separate historical records don’t tell you the chance of the whole combination.
Follow the live Celtics–Bucks matchup and explore more NBA parlay ideas.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.