CFB matchup
UABvsTemple
Sharp side
Model value
Model trendUAB Blazers games: +4.54 units on model side bets this season
Model side bets in games featuring UAB Blazers went 6–1–1 (85.7%, excluding pushes) this season, with 1 push, for an estimated profit of 4.54 units when staking one unit per bet.
Sharp total
Model value
Model forecast
Projected outcome
Matchup intelligence
Team grades
| Team | Offense | Defense | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| UAB Blazers | D+ | C- | D+ |
| Temple Owls | C | C | C |
Get the complete matchup
Unlock every rated bet and the complete matchup intelligence with Premium.
Sportsbook context
Game lines
— No usable price supplied by that book.
DraftKings
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB+105+2.5 (-110)
TEM-125-2.5 (-110)
Total 51.5Over -110Under -110
Recent form
Last 3 games
UAB Blazers
Overall2–1–0W–L–TATS2–1–0W–L–PO/U0–3–0O–U–P
| Date | Opponent | Result | Spread | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/7/26 | vs CLT | W 23–12 | W -7.5 | U 47.5 |
| 10/31/26 | @ USF | L 10–30 | L +7.5 | U 43.5 |
| 10/15/26 | vs ECU | W 30–17 | W +5.5 | U 49.5 |
W win · L loss · T tie · P push · O over · U under · — unavailable.
Temple Owls
Overall0–3–0W–L–TATS1–2–0W–L–PO/U2–1–0O–U–P
| Date | Opponent | Result | Spread | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/7/26 | @ NAVY | L 35–42 | W +8.5 | O 55.5 |
| 10/31/26 | @ ECU | L 9–17 | L +4 | U 51.5 |
| 10/17/26 | vs CLT | L 31–38 | L -17.5 | O 47.5 |
W win · L loss · T tie · P push · O over · U under · — unavailable.
Team comparison
Projected team stats
Parenthetical values show each team’s average over the last 365 days.
| Statistic | ||
|---|---|---|
| 340.5 (338.2) | Total Yards | 344.5 (329.8) |
Get the complete matchup
Unlock every rated bet and the complete matchup intelligence with Premium.
More CFB matchups
Spread BGSU -5.5Total 44.5
Sharp sideUnlock pick
Sharp totalUnlock pick
Spread AKR +13.5Total 47.5
Sharp sideUnlock pick
Sharp totalUnlock pick
Spread M-OH -1.5Total 47.5
Sharp sideUnlock pick
Sharp totalUnlock pick