Bobby McMann put four shots on goal against Toronto without recording a point. Mackie Samoskevich finished the same Seattle win with two assists and no shots on goal. If you’re backing the Kraken in Calgary, that contrast gives you a useful choice: a player can keep shooting without scoring, or help create goals without putting a shot on net.
For Friday, October 30, we’re comparing McMann to take at least two shots on goal, Adam Larsson to finish with fewer than two, and Samoskevich to record a goal or an assist. A Seattle win is the starting scenario, rather than a prediction. These are separately priced DraftKings offers, not a quoted combined parlay.
Three ways to build around a Kraken win
The table covers Seattle appearances from October 1, 2025 through the October 30 research cutoff, using the same dates and participation rules for each player’s win and overall records. McMann’s 31 Kraken games and Samoskevich’s 12 exclude their former clubs. Historical hit rates describe those games, not tonight’s chances or a combined parlay probability.
| Player prop | Price | In Seattle wins | All club appearances |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bobby McMann 2+ shots on goal |
−260 | 92.3% 12 of 13 wins |
87.1% 27 of 31 appearances |
| Adam Larsson Under 1.5 shots on goal |
−155 | 81.0% 34 of 42 wins |
68.4% 65 of 95 appearances |
| Mackie Samoskevich Over 0.5 points |
+120 | 85.7% 6 of 7 wins |
50.0% 6 of 12 appearances |
Bobby McMann: 2+ shots on goal at −260
McMann lets you separate a busy shooting night from the scoresheet. His four shots against Toronto came in 19:05 of ice time, including 4:46 on the power play. He finished without a goal or assist, but the two-shot option still came through.
That has happened in ten of his 13 games this season, including seven of eight Seattle wins. The exception in a win was Utah: one shot in 17:02. He also went without a shot in 15:24 against Florida. His average ice time is down to 16:46 from 17:58 in the older Seattle games, so an expected place on the first line doesn’t mean every night will look like Toronto.
The choice between one and two shots comes down to how much cushion you want to pay for. One was −1200 and reached in all 13 wins in this history; two at −260 missed one of those wins. Three at +105 offered a bigger payout but reached in only ten of the 13 wins and 19 of 31 games overall. That extra shot changes the case substantially.
His three Calgary meetings brought three, three and six shots. There’s useful support there, alongside the reminder from Utah that Seattle can win without him reaching two.
Adam Larsson: under 1.5 shots on goal at −155
With Larsson, you’re looking for quiet shooting from a defenseman who still plays regular minutes. His last five shot totals were one, one, zero, one and zero, while his season average of 21:34 on the ice is close to last season’s 21:22. This under doesn’t need him to sit on the bench.
The Toronto win is a good example: no shots in 19:21 across 26 shifts, with no power-play time. He has stayed below two shots in seven of Seattle’s eight wins this season. His five Calgary meetings also ended with zero or one.
Two shots are enough to lose the bet, though. Larsson reached that total in the October 9 win at Detroit while playing 20:39, and in this season’s losses to Vegas and Tampa Bay. Those misses matter because his broader winning-game record is only just above 80%, weaker than the other two options here.
At −155, you can allow one shot; you don’t need a zero. The +115 over is the opposite bet—backing him to reach two—not another way to buy the same result.
Mackie Samoskevich: over 0.5 points at +120
Samoskevich gives you a passing route as well as a scoring route. His two assists against Toronto counted for this offer despite no shots on goal. He played 14:21, including 2:37 on the power play, so that game also shows why a points bet and a shots bet aren’t interchangeable.
The larger question is how much to trust his short Seattle run. He has recorded a point in six of seven Kraken wins, but only half of his 12 appearances overall. Before Toronto, his previous two winning appearances brought goals against Detroit and Utah. The win without a point came against Washington, in 14:21.
There have been chances without a scoring return, too. Against Minnesota, he had two shots and 2:43 of power-play time within 16:21 on the ice, yet finished without a point. His expected second-line role comes with an average of 15:11 across his Seattle games, ranging from 11:54 to 18:49. That’s the workload to weigh alongside the +120 price.
Asking for two points at +650 is a much bigger step: he managed it in only two of seven wins and two of 12 games overall. His two-goal game against Calgary is already one of those nights. One goal or assist leaves more routes to a result without needing him to repeat that outing.
Pick the contribution you want to follow
If you like McMann’s involvement but don’t want to depend on a finish, his shots offer is the natural comparison with Samoskevich’s point. The Toronto game shows the distinction neatly: one kept putting pucks on net, while the other helped create goals. You can choose the contribution that fits your view of Seattle without taking both.
Jared McCann was on injured reserve in the midday report, and the forward combinations remain expected rather than confirmed. His absence alone isn’t a reason to assume more ice time for either player. Follow the live Kraken–Flames matchup for the personnel picture and current odds, or browse our NHL coverage for more matchup ideas.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.