Pacers face a Nets team with more fight than its record suggests

Brooklyn is 0-2, but its latest loss gives Indiana a reason to be careful. The Nets nearly chased down Cleveland on Saturday behind Michael Porter Jr., Julius Randle and Egor Demin, showing enough scoring punch to make the Pacers’ defensive weaknesses relevant. Indiana is a 6.5-point favorite Sunday; the interesting question is whether its stronger attack can create separation against a Brooklyn team coming home for the second night of a back-to-back.

Brooklyn’s rally comes with a catch

The Nets lost 125-121 to Cleveland after cutting a 17-point deficit with four minutes left to two in the closing seconds. Porter scored 28 points, Randle added 23 and Demin had 22, including 15 in the fourth quarter. That’s a concrete reason not to dismiss Brooklyn’s chances of keeping this competitive.

But the comeback wasn’t the whole performance. Brooklyn shot 40.2% from the floor, while Cleveland shot 50.6% and attempted 38 free throws. The Nets found a late surge; they also spent much of the night trying to recover from a substantial deficit. Now they have to turn around without a day off, while Indiana last played Friday.

Mikel Brown Jr. will sit out for rest, per Brian Lewis of the New York Post. Indiana’s T.J. McConnell is out with a hamstring injury, while Aaron Nesmith is probable with a hamstring issue. Brown’s absence adds to Brooklyn’s availability concerns on the quick turnaround.

Indiana has an advantage to build on—and a weakness to manage

Our grades favor Indiana’s attack: the Pacers earn a B offensively against Brooklyn’s B- defense. The other end is less reassuring. We give Indiana’s defense a D+, matching the grade for Brooklyn’s offense. The Nets’ overall attack rates poorly, but Saturday’s scoring shows why Indiana still needs to take its individual threats seriously.

Our rebounding and assist projections also favor Indiana, at roughly 44 rebounds to Brooklyn’s 39 and about 30 assists to the Nets’ 27. The rebounding gap gives the Pacers another potential advantage: turning it into defensive rebounds would help them finish stops, while offensive rebounds could create extra chances. The overall projection doesn’t establish how that split will fall, and Indiana still has to defend the initial shot.

Indiana has its own response to make after losing 121-105 to Dallas on Friday. The Pacers fell behind 42-23 in the first quarter. Against a Brooklyn team that just demonstrated some comeback ability, a steadier opening would make their task considerably easier.

The longer spread record also tempers the enthusiasm around Brooklyn’s rally. Bets on Nets opponents covered in 45 of 82 games over the past year, returning about 4.09 units on flat one-unit wagers. That record spans seasons and different lines, but it’s a useful reminder that Saturday’s competitive finish isn’t the whole picture.

How the scoring picture fits 232.5

The 232.5-point total brings those uneven strengths into focus. Indiana’s better-rated attack and vulnerable defense offer routes to scoring at both ends. Brooklyn’s 121 points Saturday support that possibility, but its poor field-goal shooting and second game in two nights temper the enthusiasm. Cleveland’s 38 free-throw attempts also mattered to that high-scoring game; repeating the final score would require more than simply carrying over Brooklyn’s late shooting burst.

There’s also a longer historical counterweight: 46 of Brooklyn’s 82 games over the past year finished under their respective totals. Flat one-unit bets on the under in each game returned about 6.06 units. Like the spread record, that history crosses seasons and prices, so it helps frame the scoring uncertainty rather than settle today’s number.

The clearest case for Indiana creating separation is its stronger attack, projected rebounding advantage and more forgiving schedule. Brooklyn’s counter is the scoring Porter, Randle and Demin showed Saturday against an Indiana defense we rate poorly. For the Pacers, turning their rebounding edge into completed stops is the key connection: it would let their offense build a cushion rather than keep answering Nets baskets. Brooklyn’s rally makes that defensive task worth watching, but its full-game shooting and quick turnaround argue against treating another surge as automatic.

We break down every matchup

Explore the NBA betting board for sharp picks, current odds and our matchup ratings across the league’s games.

Odds and projections are snapshots and can change. Wagering involves risk.

FREE PREMIUM PREVIEW

Unlock our Premium picks. Free.

Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.

Welcome back