Tre Tucker caught five passes for 103 yards and a touchdown against the Rams, while Kirk Cousins threw two touchdown passes. Las Vegas still lost 35–21. Their production has survived more than the Raiders’ winning games, which makes the passing offense a useful place to compare options if you’re backing Las Vegas against the Jets.
For a hypothetical Las Vegas win, these Raiders parlay picks compare Tucker reaching 25 receiving yards and Cousins throwing at least two touchdowns. Tucker can reach that yardage without scoring, while Cousins can find other receivers for his touchdowns. The selections share a passing offense; adding both doesn’t make their risks independent.
Raiders parlay picks: yards or touchdown passes?
Tucker’s history covers completed Las Vegas appearances from August 1, 2025 through October 31, 2026; Cousins’ covers his seven Raiders passing appearances this season. Receiving games require a target and passing games require a pass attempt, with the same participation rule used for each player’s all-game comparison. Genuine zeroes remain in the records.
| Player & prop | Odds | In Raiders wins | All games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tre Tucker 25+ receiving yards |
−375 | 100.0% 6 of 6 wins |
79.2% 19 of 24 appearances |
| Kirk Cousins 2+ passing touchdowns |
−128 | 100.0% 3 of 3 wins |
85.7% 6 of 7 appearances |
These are individual DraftKings prices captured on November 1. They can change, and the historical records aren’t estimates of a future parlay’s chance of winning. The perfect winning columns come from only six Tucker games and three Cousins games.
Tre Tucker — 25+ receiving yards (−375)
Tucker has reached 25 yards in all seven games this season, including totals of 97 against Buffalo and 103 against the Rams in the last two. Those two games brought nineteen targets between them. He’s listed as Las Vegas’ first receiver on the depth chart, and the recent involvement gives the lower yardage target some support.
The winning games haven’t all looked like those big recent outings. Tucker caught two passes for 27 yards in the opening win over Miami, five for 119 against the Chargers and four for 43 against New Orleans. The Miami game is particularly useful when choosing the line: 25 yards cleared, while 30 would have missed.
Thirty yards costs less at −272. Across his twenty-four Raiders appearances in this history, that target cleared five of six wins and sixteen games overall. Twenty-five cleared all six wins and nineteen games overall. The extra price keeps the Miami win and three appearances overall, rather than buying a requirement that he repeat a hundred-yard game.
Going lower costs more: twenty yards is −555. It cleared the same six wins and twenty-one appearances overall. The two additional clears were losses against the Chargers and Denver last season, when he finished with twenty and twenty-four yards. They show what the lower line buys, but it didn’t improve the winning column in this sample.
There are more substantial misses in the broader record. Tucker went without a catch on three targets in the 31–0 loss at Philadelphia last December. He also managed only twelve yards on eight targets in an earlier loss to the Chargers. Targets create opportunities; they don’t ensure the catches or yardage needed for this selection.
The older games also came before Cousins’ current Raiders passing record, so they add context rather than proving the current partnership will repeat them. The strongest recent support is Tucker’s seven straight games at or above 25, with the 27-yard Miami win showing how narrow the room can be.
At −375, you’re paying for a modest yardage demand and a strong recent record. If you’d rather take the lighter 30-yard price, the tradeoff is concrete: it asks Tucker to do more than he did in one of this season’s three wins. Neither line requires him to score a touchdown.
Kirk Cousins — 2+ passing touchdowns (−128)
Cousins threw three touchdown passes in each of Las Vegas’ three wins this season. That’s the appealing link with the result you’re backing, but it’s only three games. The more useful supporting detail is that two touchdown passes has also cleared in three of the four losses.
He threw two against Kansas City, two against Buffalo and two against the Rams. Moving from two touchdowns to three would have lost all three of those games. Three or more is offered at +321, and it has cleared three of seven appearances overall, compared with six of seven for two or more.
The winning column doesn’t separate the two prices yet: both cleared all three wins. The all-game record does. If you’re considering the plus-money target because of the three-touchdown wins, remember that Cousins hasn’t thrown three in any of the four games since that winning run.
One passing touchdown is much heavier at −850 and has cleared all seven games. That lower target would have kept the New England game, the only miss for two: Cousins threw for 243 yards but only one touchdown in the 45–17 defeat. A productive yardage total doesn’t guarantee a second touchdown pass.
Nor does this require a particular receiver to score. Cousins’ latest two touchdown passes went to Tucker and Ashton Jeanty. Tucker’s 25-yard selection could clear through ordinary catches elsewhere on the field, while the touchdown passes could go to other receivers. That’s flexibility in what you ask from each player, though both still depend on the same offense functioning.
Cousins is the expected starting quarterback, and his seven-game record is the full Raiders passing sample available here. It doesn’t borrow his previous teams’ wins. Jackson Powers-Johnson is listed questionable with a back injury, so the offensive-line personnel still deserve attention before kickoff.
The −128 price asks for scoring through the air, with less room than the expensive one-touchdown option and a stronger recent all-game record than three. Choose it if two passing scores fit your view of a Raiders win, rather than treating the small perfect winning sample as a promise.
Decide how much passing production to ask for
Tucker’s selection is the more expensive way to keep the yardage requirement low. Cousins’ is the lighter-priced way to ask for two passing scores, with one recent game showing that he can throw for more than 240 yards and still fall short.
You can choose either without combining them. If you do combine them with a Raiders win, use the sportsbook’s actual same-game parlay quote. Tucker receiving yards and Cousins’ passing touchdowns share opportunities, and their separate records don’t establish a combined price or success rate.
Follow the live Raiders–Jets matchup or explore more NFL parlay ideas.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.