Kyrie Irving scored 34 points in Cleveland, and Dallas still spent the fourth quarter chasing a game it couldn’t recover. Boston just showed the opposite kind of survival skill: Jayson Tatum shot poorly, but the Celtics erased a 22-point deficit and won anyway. That’s the question bringing these teams together: can the Mavericks defend well enough to keep Irving’s offense meaningful against a rested Boston team?
Dallas needs stops that don’t depend on made shots
The Mavericks’ 127-117 loss in Cleveland was more concerning than the score alone. The Cavaliers played without their entire usual starting lineup, yet Tyrese Proctor delivered 24 points, 11 rebounds and 10 assists. His back-to-back fourth-quarter threes pushed Cleveland’s lead to 22. Dallas couldn’t keep a depleted opponent from finding enough offense to control the finish.
Irving supplied a real response, scoring 20 points in the third quarter. Cooper Flagg added 18 points and eight rebounds, but the Mavericks needed more than a scoring burst to undo the damage. Against Boston, the important response isn’t simply another big Irving quarter. It’s whether Dallas can string together stops before the deficit demands one.
This wasn’t an isolated defensive stumble. Dallas has allowed 122, 133 and 127 points in its last three games, failing to cover the spread in all three. The Mavericks beat Indiana in the first of those games, so the stretch isn’t three straight losses. It does show how little room their defense has left for an uneven offensive night. Their previous wins over Brooklyn and Utah, with 93 and 100 points allowed, offer a much better version of the game they need here.
Boston has found ways to win without easy offense
The Celtics’ 98-93 comeback in Toronto extended their winning streak to five. Tatum finished with 24 points despite shooting 6-for-21 overall and 2-for-11 from three. He scored the first 10 points of a 16-0 second-quarter run, then made the tying and go-ahead free throws with 25.2 seconds left. Boston didn’t need his jumper to cooperate all night to get a winning contribution.
Derrick White added 19 points, Payton Pritchard scored 14, and Neemias Queta supplied 11 points and 13 rebounds. That support matters against a Dallas team that just couldn’t contain Cleveland’s secondary scorers. Boston has also held each of its last five opponents to 102 points or fewer. The Celtics have three full days off between games; Dallas arrives on the second night of a road back-to-back.
Paul George is expected back from illness after missing Toronto, giving Boston another potential scoring option.
The spread asks more than a Boston win
DraftKings lists Boston as a 13.5-point favorite. Dallas’ recent defense and the rest disadvantage explain why the Celtics command a substantial number. But Toronto also showed the risk of paying for a comfortable Boston victory: the Celtics needed a late comeback to beat an opponent they ultimately held below 100.
Sharpest Bets Premium
Get our Mavericks vs. Celtics picks.
See our model's picks for this game, plus the projections and trends behind them. Use PREVIEW20 for 20% off Premium Monthly. New members who qualify get 3 days free.
We expect Boston to make about four more three-pointers than Dallas, while committing roughly two fewer turnovers. The perimeter gap gives the Celtics a way to separate without dominating the number of made baskets. The turnover edge would also leave Dallas fewer chances to turn defensive plays into quick points.
For the favorite’s price to be attractive, Boston needs those advantages to produce sustained separation rather than another late escape. The case for taking the points depends on Dallas keeping possessions competitive: protect the ball, avoid repeated breakdowns beyond the arc, and give Irving and Flagg a manageable game to attack. Another scoring burst from Irving won’t be enough if Boston keeps answering with clean possessions.
Can Dallas pull the total away from Boston’s preferred kind of game?
The total is 216.5, and the teams bring different recent scoring stories. Boston games have finished Under in nine of 12 games this season. Dallas games have gone Over in three straight, with opponents doing much of the work. Those Dallas results are a warning against assuming tired legs automatically mean a low-scoring night: defensive mistakes can outweigh missed shots.
Boston’s latest result also shows how the Celtics can win without lifting a total. Toronto made 10 first-quarter threes, then went 6-for-25 from distance the rest of the way. Boston recovered while scoring only 98 points itself. If the Celtics make Dallas work through long possessions and the Mavericks defend more like they did against Brooklyn and Utah, the scoring threshold becomes harder to clear.
The other route is Boston exploiting the same defensive trouble Cleveland and Minnesota exposed. Our expected three-point advantage matters differently here than it does for the spread: it can widen Boston’s lead, but the total still depends on how much Dallas contributes. An Over case needs Dallas to keep answering or to give Boston enough easy offense that the Celtics carry more of the scoring. An Under case needs actual stops, not just a comfortable Boston lead.
Watch Dallas after the first missed shots
I’ll be watching whether the Mavericks stay connected defensively when their jumpers don’t fall. If they do, Irving and Flagg have a chance to make Boston earn its advantage; if they don’t, the Celtics’ perimeter scoring could turn another rough stretch into a large deficit. Visit the NBA betting board to compare this game’s sizable spread and lower scoring threshold with the rest of Sunday’s matchups.
Odds and projections are snapshots and can change. Wagering involves risk.
More matchups to explore
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.