Joe Burrow threw four touchdown passes without an interception in Cincinnati’s 35–13 win over Baltimore. Ja’Marr Chase finished with sixty-two receiving yards. It was a productive Bengals afternoon without requiring Chase to reach a hundred yards, which is useful when deciding how much to ask from each player against Tennessee.
If you’re backing Cincinnati, these Bengals parlay picks let you choose what to ask from the passing games: Burrow avoiding an interception, Chase reaching sixty receiving yards or Elic Ayomanor getting to ten for Tennessee. The Titans can lose while Ayomanor still catches a useful pass. You can compare those contributions around a Bengals win without needing all three.
Bengals parlay picks: a clean passing game or a receiving target
The records cover games with each player’s current club from August 1, 2025 through October 31, 2026. Each all-game comparison covers the same dates and club, including every game in which Burrow attempted a pass or the receiver drew a target.
| Player & prop | Odds | With this result | All games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Burrow No interception |
−160 | 88.9% 8 of 9 CIN wins |
64.3% 9 of 14 appearances |
| Ja’Marr Chase 60+ receiving yards |
−255 | 80.0% 8 of 10 CIN wins |
68.2% 15 of 22 appearances |
| Elic Ayomanor 10+ receiving yards |
−670 | 94.7% 18 of 19 TEN losses |
91.3% 21 of 23 appearances |
These individual DraftKings prices were captured November 1 and can change. The nine or ten Bengals wins in the table are modest samples. Chase’s current-season winning record is three of four; Ayomanor has reached ten yards in all six Tennessee losses this season.
Joe Burrow — No interception (−160)
Burrow has gone without an interception in eight of nine Bengals wins among his fourteen passing appearances across last season and this one. His latest two wins, against Miami and Baltimore, each brought four touchdown passes and no interceptions. That makes ball security an option without requiring him to throw four more scores.
The offer is Under 0.5 interceptions at −160: one interception loses it. Cincinnati’s opening win over Tampa Bay is the direct counterexample. Burrow threw one interception on thirty-five attempts, and the Bengals still won 33–27. Backing the team result doesn’t make a clean passing afternoon inevitable.
His most recent miss came against Jacksonville, when he threw two interceptions while passing for 428 yards on fifty-four attempts. Yardage didn’t protect the selection. The two other two-interception games in the broader record came in losses to Buffalo and Baltimore last December; those remain part of the all-game comparison.
Three passing touchdowns is a different way to ask for a productive Burrow game, offered at +124. It has cleared three of the nine Bengals wins and six of fourteen passing appearances overall. Avoiding an interception cleared eight wins and nine appearances overall. The prices reflect different demands: the interception under asks for a cleaner game, while the touchdown over needs at least three scoring passes.
Burrow is the expected starting quarterback with no current injury designation. A thirteen-attempt outing against Jacksonville last season is part of his record, so an interception-free appearance hasn’t always meant a full afternoon of passing. This season, he’s avoided an interception in four of six games, including three of Cincinnati’s four wins.
Choose the −160 option if keeping turnovers out of Cincinnati’s passing game fits your view of a win. The recent eight touchdown passes across two games are encouraging offensive context, but they aren’t what this market asks him to repeat.
Ja’Marr Chase — 60+ receiving yards (−255)
Chase’s latest three winning totals are seventy-five yards against Houston, seventy-seven against Miami and sixty-two against Baltimore. Those games give the sixty-yard target recent support while showing that a Bengals win needn’t produce an eighty- or hundred-yard receiving total.
The Baltimore game is especially useful when choosing the line. Chase caught five passes on seven targets for sixty-two yards, just two above this requirement. Seventy yards would have missed. That higher target costs less at −176, but it has cleared six of ten Cincinnati wins and thirteen of twenty-two appearances overall, compared with eight wins and fifteen appearances for sixty.
Going down to fifty costs more at −406. It cleared the same eight wins and sixteen appearances overall. The extra cost buys one additional clear in the all-game record, but it doesn’t recover either of the winning-game misses at sixty.
Those misses were substantial: twenty-six yards against Cleveland in last season’s opener and twelve against Tampa Bay in this season’s opener. In the Tampa Bay win, Chase caught two passes on four targets. A lower target of fifty would still have fallen well short, so paying more for that alternative wouldn’t have solved those two examples.
There’s another recent warning in the Jacksonville loss: three catches on three targets for twenty-seven yards. Chase is the expected first receiver, but the difference between three targets there and seven in his latest game is meaningful. Opportunities and completed catches still have to produce enough yardage.
Across this season alone, sixty yards has cleared four of six appearances and three of four wins. That’s a lower success rate than the eight-of-ten winning record across both seasons. Last season’s Arizona win landed on exactly sixty yards, another reminder that the margin can be narrow.
At −255, sixty gives you a lower requirement than seventy without paying the heavier fifty-yard price. It’s a choice for a productive Chase afternoon, not a demand that he reproduce Burrow’s full passing output or score a touchdown himself.
Elic Ayomanor — 10+ receiving yards (−670)
Ayomanor has reached ten receiving yards in eighteen of nineteen Tennessee losses and twenty-one of twenty-three target appearances across last season and this one. At −670, you’re paying for a small yardage requirement. It doesn’t require the Titans’ passing game to flourish.
Two of his losing games this season finished at eleven yards, against the Jets and Giants. Requiring fifteen yards brings the price down to −392, but it would have lost both of those games. Across the full record, fifteen cleared fourteen of nineteen losses and sixteen of twenty-three appearances overall, compared with eighteen losses and twenty-one appearances for ten.
Twenty yards costs −250 and cleared twelve of nineteen losses and thirteen appearances overall. Raising the target makes a considerable difference to the record even though the numbers still look modest for a receiver. Ten yards is the expensive choice that keeps the eleven-yard outings.
Ayomanor’s latest game brought three catches for forty-four yards on seven targets in the 27–24 loss to Cleveland. Tennessee has ruled Carnell Tate out with a shoulder injury, while Calvin Ridley is questionable with a hip injury. Ayomanor is expected in the receiving group, but those absences and uncertainties don’t guarantee that the targets will fall to him in any fixed number.
The misses keep that point concrete. He had one catch for three yards on two targets in Tennessee’s win at Indianapolis this season. The only losing-game miss in the broader record was a five-yard catch on five targets against Jacksonville last November. Even five targets have failed to produce ten yards.
All six Tennessee losses this season have cleared this target, with the Indianapolis game the sole current-season miss. That supports considering Ayomanor even if you’re backing Cincinnati, but the −670 price gives you little return for accepting the remaining risk. Choose it only if the small yardage requirement is worth that cost to you; the cheaper fifteen-yard line changes the demand enough to lose several past clears.
Decide what you want from the passing game
Burrow’s interception under is the lighter-priced option if your view rests on a clean Cincinnati passing game. For Chase, the useful choice is sixty versus seventy: his latest winning total shows exactly which game the cheaper, higher target would have lost.
You can choose the option that fits your view without combining them all. For any combination with Cincinnati to win, use the sportsbook’s actual same-game parlay quote; the separate historical records don’t establish joint odds or independence.
Follow the live Titans–Bengals matchup, or explore more NFL parlay ideas.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.