Jackson LaCombe has finished with zero or one shot on goal in all eight Anaheim losses this season, even while playing heavy minutes. For Penguins parlay picks against the Ducks, that gives you a way to support a Pittsburgh win without asking an Anaheim player to disappear from the game.
Side & Support Parlay Plays starts with that Penguins-win view and looks at LaCombe’s shooting and Beckett Sennecke’s assists in Ducks losses, compared with their records across all appearances. The two unders ask for different things: limited shooting from a defenseman or no assist from a forward who can still score himself. You can choose the one that fits your game view.
Two Penguins parlay picks to compare
LaCombe’s row covers this season’s seventeen Anaheim appearances; Sennecke’s covers his 2025–26 and 2026–27 regular seasons with the Ducks. LaCombe’s perfect record is only eight losses, and Sennecke’s longer losing-game rate sits just above eighty percent. Individual DraftKings prices were observed Sunday, November 8, and can change.
| Player & prop | Odds | With this result | All appearances |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jackson LaCombe Under 1.5 shots on goal 2026–27 regular season |
−155 | 100.0% 8 of 8 ANA losses |
82.4% 14 of 17 ANA appearances |
| Beckett Sennecke Under 0.5 assists 2025–26 & 2026–27 regular seasons |
−140 | 80.9% 38 of 47 ANA losses |
62.6% 62 of 99 ANA appearances |
Jackson LaCombe: under 1.5 shots on goal
LaCombe’s recent zero-shot games haven’t depended on a short night. He finished without a shot against Vancouver in 23:41, then again against Edmonton while playing 33:09. Anaheim won both games, showing that this shooting under can remain attainable even when the Ducks get their offense going elsewhere.
Under 1.5 shots cost −155. It allows one shot, which matters: four of Anaheim’s eight losses this season ended with LaCombe on one, while the other four ended with none. The choice isn’t that he must avoid shooting altogether, but that he stays below two shots on goal.
His latest game supplies a direct counterexample. LaCombe had two shots in 30:04 in Anaheim’s win over Calgary. Two against Vegas and two against Ottawa were his other misses this season. Across all seventeen appearances, those are the three games that beat the under, so the perfect losing-game record is part of a broader recent pattern rather than its only support.
That pattern changes sharply when you look further back. Across the two regular seasons, the under landed in only 28 of 47 Anaheim losses and 56 of 99 appearances overall. Last spring’s separate playoff games also included two shots against Edmonton and Vegas, and three in the final Vegas loss. This is a current-season shooting angle, not a long-established habit whenever the Ducks lose.
LaCombe is expected on Anaheim’s first defensive pair, and his seventeen games this season range from 17:01 to 33:09. You’re asking for restrained shooting from someone who can spend a large part of the game on the ice. The recent low shot totals are useful; his role doesn’t provide a built-in minutes cushion.
Beckett Sennecke: under 0.5 assists
Sennecke’s assist under is a different sort of choice. In Anaheim’s loss to Edmonton he scored twice and put seven shots on goal, yet had no assist. He also scored without an assist in losses to Calgary, Boston and Vancouver. This option can work while he remains dangerous around the net.
Under 0.5 assists cost −140. His no-point offer paid +155, but he finished without a point in only 26 of 47 Ducks losses and 43 of 99 appearances across the two regular seasons. The assist under covered 38 losses and 62 appearances. Asking for no assist leaves his own scoring available; asking for no point would turn any goal into a miss as well.
His latest form is the strongest reason to hesitate. Sennecke recorded four assists against Vancouver, one against Edmonton and two against Calgary in Anaheim’s last three games. All three were wins, which fits the historical comparison, but seven assists in three games is still a considerable challenge to an under. A Pittsburgh-win view doesn’t erase that recent production.
The loss to Buffalo shows that Anaheim doesn’t have to win for him to create a goal. Sennecke had a goal and an assist in 21:13 that night. It was his only assist in eight Ducks losses this season; the other seven were without one. Across all seventeen appearances this season, he finished without an assist eleven times. There were nine losing-game misses across the longer record, including a two-assist game against Edmonton last season.
Last spring’s playoff appearances provide some separate support: he had no assist in any of Anaheim’s six losses. Those games are separate from the regular-season record in the table. His current expected spot is on the second line, and this season’s appearances range from 15:37 to 24:58, so this choice asks for a quiet passing night without relying on limited ice time.
Sharpest Bets Premium
Get our Penguins vs. Ducks picks.
Unlock our model's best bets for this matchup, plus projections, trends, and matchup analysis. Start with a free 7-day trial, then save 20% every month with code PARLAY20.
Choose the Ducks contribution you expect to stay quiet
LaCombe gives you the recent low-shot pattern, with a much weaker longer history. Sennecke offers a larger losing-game sample at a lighter price, challenged by a very productive last three games. Both can have useful nights while staying under these particular lines, but more Anaheim production can challenge both choices. You don’t need to combine them to use the comparison.
Follow the live Penguins–Ducks matchup and explore more NHL parlay ideas.
More picks to build around
Unlock our Premium picks. Free.
Get our sharpest picks, team grades, and projected score in your inbox.