The Betting Hub

Colorado has scored five in three straight wins. Columbus has kept recent games close, and its ability to keep the Avalanche off the power play could matter again.

Columbus needed just one goal against Dallas to beat one of these unders. The other held up. Here’s how to weigh the two if you’re backing Colorado.

A point from Zach Werenski costs more than two shots from Matthew Knies. Columbus’s wins show what you get for the difference in price.

Travis Konecny gave Philadelphia an immediate lift against Utah. Minnesota brings a stronger attack and a goalie who has kept several recent games tight.

A Flyers win can leave room for Kaprizov to get a point or Eriksson Ek to score. Here’s where each under starts to get uncomfortable.

A goal was enough for Quinn Hughes on Sunday. Jamie Drysdale’s three assists that day show what Minnesota would need to limit.

Vegas has scored two or fewer in five of six since beating Pittsburgh 6–2. The Penguins bring a steadier attack and a chance to test Vegas’s penalty kill.

One shot would clear either target. Compare Trevor Connelly’s even-money under with Ivan Barbashev’s one-shot milestone if you’re backing Pittsburgh.

Mark Stone had three points in the first Pittsburgh meeting. Jack Eichel had two points but zero shots. Here’s how that distinction changes the props to consider.

St. Louis broke out for nine goals in two games. New York is a slight home favorite, and how much the Blues can sustain matters to both the moneyline and a total of 5.5.

Adam Fox can get there with a goal or an assist. Mason McTavish only needs two shots. Compare how each prop has fared alongside a Rangers win.

Montreal won the first meeting 2–1. Winnipeg has allowed 23 goals in four games since, and its own scoring may determine how the rematch plays at 5.5.

Kyle Connor and Mark Scheifele are both −195 for a point. Their 97 games side by side show where the two offers differ.

Montreal held Winnipeg to one goal in October, and Kyle Connor still put five shots on net. Neal Pionk’s assist line asks a different question.

Edmonton has scored four in three straight wins. New Jersey brings its own scoring punch and a small projected edge in shots.

McDavid’s assist costs less than his point prop. Gritsyuk’s under comes at a lighter price, but his two goals against Vegas are a reminder of the risk.

Luke Evangelista had three shots without a point against Vegas. Compare his two-shot target with a Jack Hughes point if you’re backing New Jersey.

Detroit has scored at least four in four straight games. Tampa Bay has the stronger grades, but its recent results show what can happen when opponents keep pace.

Brandon Hagel can get there with a goal or an assist. Viktor Arvidsson can score and still stay under. Here’s how those two lines fit a Tampa Bay win.

Detroit scored four against San Jose without a point from Lucas Raymond. His record in wins still makes for an interesting comparison with Anthony Cirelli’s points under.

Carolina gave up three goals across four straight wins. Nashville’s power play offers a way to make Tuesday’s game closer than the moneyline suggests.

Roman Josi can get his shots even if Nashville struggles to score. Steven Stamkos can score himself and still stay under his assist line.

Barnes and Barrett give Toronto a scoring foundation, but Sunday’s late reserve rally masked a big deficit. The Clippers seek more support for Hachimura after five straight losses.

Jackson’s latest eight boards challenge his rebound under as his minutes rise. Quickley’s three-board target offers another route alongside a Clippers win.

Barnes had exactly six boards in two Toronto wins this season. Weigh the cost of that lower target against Hachimura rebounds and Wagler’s points under.