CFB matchup
UAB1 – 2vsRice1 – 2
Sharp side
TBD
Model value
Sharp total
TBD
Model value
Model forecast
Projected outcome
A projection is not available because one or both teams do not have sufficient qualifying history.
Matchup intelligence
Team grades
| Team | Offense | Defense | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| UAB Blazers | D+ | D | D+ |
| Rice Owls | C- | C | C- |
Sportsbook context
Game lines
A dash means that book has not supplied a usable price.
DraftKings
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB-360-10.5 (-110)
RICE+295+10.5 (-110)
Total 51.0Over -110Under -110
BetMGM
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB-350-10.0 (-110)
RICE+260+10.0 (-110)
Total 51.5Over -110Under -110
Caesars
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB—-10.5 (-110)
RICE—+10.5 (-110)
Total —Over —Under —
ESPN BET
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB-350—
RICE+275—
Total 51.0Over -115Under -105
Fanatics
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB-385-10.5 (-110)
RICE+290+10.5 (-110)
Total 51.0Over -110Under -110
SugarHouse
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB-400-10.5 (-106)
RICE+310+10.5 (-114)
Total 51.5Over -109Under -111
Titanbets
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB-351-10.5 (-105)
RICE+290+10.5 (-111)
Total 51.0Over -110Under -110
Unibet
TeamMoneylineSpread
UAB-400-10.5 (-108)
RICE+295+10.5 (-115)
Total 51.5Over -110Under -113
Recent form
Last 10 games
UAB Blazers
Overall7–3–0W–L–TATS8–2–0W–L–PO/U5–5–0O–U–P
| Date | Opponent | Result | Spread | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/17/22 | vs GASO | W 35–21 | W -11.5 | U 59 |
| 9/10/22 | @ LIB | L 14–21 | L -6 | U 50 |
| 9/1/22 | vs AAMU | W 59–0 | W -40.5 | U 60.5 |
| 12/18/21 | vs BYU | W 31–28 | W +6 | O 54 |
| 11/26/21 | vs UTEP | W 42–25 | W -13.5 | O 50.5 |
| 11/20/21 | @ UTSA | L 31–34 | W +4 | O 53.5 |
| 11/13/21 | @ MRSH | W 21–14 | W +4.5 | U 55.5 |
| 11/6/21 | vs LT | W 52–38 | W -13.5 | O 49 |
| 10/23/21 | vs RICE | L 24–30 | L -23.5 | O 44.5 |
| 10/16/21 | @ USM | W 34–0 | W -17 | U 43.5 |
W win · L loss · T tie · P push · O over · U under · — unavailable.
Rice Owls
Overall4–6–0W–L–TATS5–5–0W–L–PO/U9–1–0O–U–P
| Date | Opponent | Result | Spread | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/24/22 | @ HOU | L 27–34 | W +17.5 | O 52.5 |
| 9/17/22 | vs UL | W 33–21 | W +11.5 | O 52 |
| 9/10/22 | vs MCN | W 52–10 | W -7.5 | O 52.5 |
| 9/3/22 | @ USC | L 14–66 | L +32.5 | O 61.5 |
| 11/27/21 | vs LT | W 35–31 | W +4 | O 52.5 |
| 11/20/21 | @ UTEP | L 28–38 | L +9 | O 47 |
| 11/13/21 | vs WKU | L 21–42 | L +19 | O 61.5 |
| 11/6/21 | @ CLT | L 24–31 | L +6.5 | O 52.5 |
| 10/30/21 | vs UNT | L 24–30 | L -1.5 | U 55 |
| 10/23/21 | @ UAB | W 30–24 | W +23.5 | O 44.5 |
W win · L loss · T tie · P push · O over · U under · — unavailable.
Team comparison
Projected team stats
Parenthetical values show each team’s average over the last 365 days.
| Statistic | ||
|---|---|---|
| N/A (375.3) | Total Yards | N/A (299.1) |
| N/A (240.1) | Passing Yards | N/A (97.8) |
| N/A (22.6) | Pass Completions | N/A (11.0) |
| N/A (35.9) | Pass Attempts | N/A (17.6) |
| N/A (135.2) | Rushing Yards | N/A (201.3) |
| N/A (34.6) | Rushing Attempts | N/A (48.4) |
| N/A (20.5) | First Downs | N/A (16.4) |
Get the complete matchup
Unlock every rated bet and the complete matchup intelligence with Premium.