CFB matchup
Rice1 – 2vsFlorida Atlantic2 – 1
Sharp side
TBD
Model value
Sharp total
TBD
Model value
Model forecast
Projected outcome
A projection is not available because one or both teams do not have sufficient qualifying history.
Matchup intelligence
Team grades
| Team | Offense | Defense | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rice Owls | C- | C | C- |
| Florida Atlantic Owls | C+ | D | C |
Sportsbook context
Game lines
A dash means that book has not supplied a usable price.
DraftKings
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+160+4.5 (-110)
FAU-190-4.5 (-110)
Total 54.5Over -110Under -110
BetMGM
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+150+4.5 (+100)
FAU-185-4.5 (-120)
Total 55.5Over -110Under -110
Caesars
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE—+4.5 (-110)
FAU—-4.5 (-110)
Total —Over —Under —
ESPN BET
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+150—
FAU-190—
Total 54.5Over -110Under -110
Fanatics
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+160+4.0 (-110)
FAU-196-4.0 (-110)
Total 54.5Over -115Under -105
SugarHouse
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+163+4.0 (-109)
FAU-204-4.0 (-111)
Total 54.5Over -109Under -111
Titanbets
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+165+4.5 (-110)
FAU-200-4.5 (-110)
Total 54.5Over -110Under -110
Unibet
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+163+4.0 (+102)
FAU-205-4.0 (-125)
Total 55.5Over +106Under -132
Westgate
TeamMoneylineSpread
RICE+155+4.0 (-110)
FAU-175-4.0 (-110)
Total 55.5Over -110Under -110
Recent form
Last 10 games
Rice Owls
Overall4–6–0W–L–TATS5–5–0W–L–PO/U9–1–0O–U–P
| Date | Opponent | Result | Spread | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/1/22 | vs UAB | W 28–24 | W +10.5 | O 51 |
| 9/24/22 | @ HOU | L 27–34 | W +17.5 | O 52.5 |
| 9/17/22 | vs UL | W 33–21 | W +11.5 | O 52 |
| 9/10/22 | vs MCN | W 52–10 | W -7.5 | O 52.5 |
| 9/3/22 | @ USC | L 14–66 | L +32.5 | O 61.5 |
| 11/27/21 | vs LT | W 35–31 | W +4 | O 52.5 |
| 11/20/21 | @ UTEP | L 28–38 | L +9 | O 47 |
| 11/13/21 | vs WKU | L 21–42 | L +19 | O 61.5 |
| 11/6/21 | @ CLT | L 24–31 | L +6.5 | O 52.5 |
| 10/30/21 | vs UNT | L 24–30 | L -1.5 | U 55 |
W win · L loss · T tie · P push · O over · U under · — unavailable.
Florida Atlantic Owls
Overall2–8–0W–L–TATS3–7–0W–L–PO/U3–7–0O–U–P
| Date | Opponent | Result | Spread | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/1/22 | @ UNT | L 28–45 | L -3 | O 67.5 |
| 9/24/22 | @ PUR | L 26–28 | W +16.5 | U 57.5 |
| 9/17/22 | vs UCF | L 14–40 | L +7.5 | U 61.5 |
| 9/10/22 | vs SELA | W 42–9 | W -11 | U 63.5 |
| 9/3/22 | @ OHIO | L 38–41 | L -6 | O 51 |
| 8/27/22 | vs CLT | W 43–13 | W -7 | U 60 |
| 11/27/21 | vs MTSU | L 17–27 | L -3.5 | U 49.5 |
| 11/20/21 | @ WKU | L 17–52 | L +10.5 | O 64 |
| 11/13/21 | @ ODU | L 16–30 | L -6.5 | U 48 |
| 11/6/21 | vs MRSH | L 13–28 | L +1.5 | U 57.5 |
W win · L loss · T tie · P push · O over · U under · — unavailable.
Team comparison
Projected team stats
Parenthetical values show each team’s average over the last 365 days.
| Statistic | ||
|---|---|---|
| N/A (299.1) | Total Yards | N/A (419.4) |
| N/A (97.8) | Passing Yards | N/A (330.5) |
| N/A (11.0) | Pass Completions | N/A (31.0) |
| N/A (17.6) | Pass Attempts | N/A (45.5) |
| N/A (201.3) | Rushing Yards | N/A (88.9) |
| N/A (48.4) | Rushing Attempts | N/A (30.9) |
| N/A (16.4) | First Downs | N/A (23.8) |
Get the complete matchup
Unlock every rated bet and the complete matchup intelligence with Premium.